アレックス・アバーグはどのようにして亡くなったのか?

始めることにしました 2020 プロレスの 2 つの例を使って、なぜ過去に書いた歴史的記述を変更するのかを議論します. 歴史を書く上で, 主題に関して利用可能な情報源が限られている. 日記などの一次情報源, 公式記録や自伝は非常に貴重です. Other sources like newspapers are good as well but you are limited by the accuracy of the reporting, bias of the writer and the sources they had in writing the story.

In the last year, I received information which refuted two things I had previously written. In the end, I decided not to change either account based on the information available but could change them in the future, if other sources to back up the new accounts can be found.

The first regarded the death of Alex Aberg and Georg Lurich, two Estonian professional wrestlers, who died during the Russian Civil War. Due to their participation in the 1915 New York International Wrestling Tournament, which Aberg won, both men were well-known in America.

The New York newspapers printed in early 1920 an article from the international wire service about the death of both wrestlers. Their deaths were shocking as both were physical culturist in excellent condition. While fleeing the Red Army and attempting to leave Russia through the South, both men contracted typhoid fever.

George Lurich died from the disease on January 22, 1920 に 43 years-old. ABERG, who was younger by five years, recovered. <スパンbbox_x = "14" fweight = "3"赤= "255"緑= "255"青= "255"アルファ= "=" 244 "bbox_y =" 627 "bbox_w =" 56 "bbox_h =" 20 "FSIZE, he contracted pneumonia and died on February 15, 1920 歳の時 38.

昨年, a reader communicated to me that both men were actually shot by the Red Army in early 1920. This account is possible as whichever army controlled the area at the time would have controlled news coming out of the area.

I asked for a source for the information but never received one. Since everything I’ve found contains the same information printed above, I left the account of their death unchanged.

The second incident occurred while listening to ジム・コルネットの体験 ポッドキャスト. In addition to being a respected manager, territory owner and booker, Jim Cornette is one of the most respected wrestling historians today.

On an episode talking about the great double crosses in professional wrestling, one of the double crosses he discussed was Gotch quickly defeating Hackenschmidt after agreeing to carry the injured Hackenschmidt to keep “ハック” from cancelling the match. 私 wrote a post about why this scenario was possible but out-of-character for Hackenschmidt.

読んだ後に フォールガイズ マーカス・グリフィン, a journalist who worked in the Buffalo professional wrestling office, which was the source Jim Cornette quoted, I was hesitant to change it because Griffin wrote his book in 1937. The second Gotch-Hack match took place in 1911.

読んだ後に フッカー ルー・テーズ, I decided to leave the book and the accounts of the match as-is. Thesz stated Griffin worked in the Buffalo office, was mad at the promoters, who fired him, and wrote the book to expose professional wrestling and hurt the business. Griffin would have based his version on stories he heard in the office and not his actual participation in the arrangements.

A historian should always try to tell the most accurate story possible. It often means judging between sources and trying to decipher the most complete information possible. I hope this post was helpful in understanding the research, which goes into historical books and posts.

以下のコメントセクションまたは私の投稿で、コメントを残したり、これや投稿について質問したりできます。 Facebookページ または Twitterのプロフィール.

ピン留め